Register     Login     Terms Of Use     Privacy Statement
  Search        "... ontdoe de natuur van haar vormen en ge zult de geest vinden ..." Theo van Doesburg (1883-1931) oprichter van DE STIJL
Home
Archive Minimize
  

Links Minimize
  

Editorial Minimize
By SuperUser Account on Monday, December 19, 2011 5:53 PM

Symbol of Wealth: Gold

Photo by Kriplozoik. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

In my blog comment on Capitalism: A Love Story I promised to get back to you if I had worked out an anti-revolution and anti-rebellion plan to make governments more stable. To stop this constant battle between order (settled governments) and chaos (revolutionary forces) we know so well from millenia of written human history, I have worked out a Robin Hood plan to redistribute wealth taken from the rich and given to the poor in order to calm the masses and give the world more stability. This makes the wealth distribution in a country more like the Pareto 20 – 80 rule (i.e. in the western world this is nowadays more like the Top 20% richest have 95% of the wealth = 20 – 95). Because of the universal nature of the 20 – 80 rule I regard that as the most natural and fair distribution considering the “God given” differences in skills and intelligence among humans leading to income and wealth distributions inequality.

 
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
There are no categories in this blog.
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
test
The Wild-Type Gene Pool is in Jeopardy!
Carbon Dioxide Damage in the Flora and Climate Change
Launch of New Website with Editorial Blog
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
Re: The Wild-Type Gene Pool is in Jeopardy!
That is so true As an author and business man, I can relate to how you said "There is of course the fear that biohackers produce intentionally or unintentionally a so lethal DNA source code, which threatens the good functioning of the whole evolutionary program".I hope more people discover your blog because you really know what you're talking about. Can't wait to read more from you!
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
Skip Navigation Links.
 Print   

Editorial Minimize
 Print   

Authors Minimize
  

Audience Minimize

Most of the people that read or publish in SATOCONOR Journals belong to one of two groups. Before I continue I say emphatically that this is a caricature:

• They that want to proof that Einstein was wrong!

• They that want to proof that Einstein was right!

But in every caricature or joke for that matter is a kernel of truth about the author. Moreover it takes one to recognize one. Or you best catch a thief with a thief, and so one. But seriously most authors are non-professionals, nontheless highly intelligent and creative people with a passion for science and mathematics. Although most of the time they are neglected by the scientific establishment. The Journal of Randomics is their loophole. However sometimes there is peer review collaboration with universities and scientific institutes. Moreover valuable SATOCONOR Journals articles are not neglected by Wikipedia page makers, passed the sci.math.research moderator and Sloane's Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences peer review.

Johan G. van der Galiën (Chief Editor)

July 16, 2011