Most of the people that read or publish in SATOCONOR Journals belong to one of two groups. Before I continue I say emphatically that this is a caricature:
• They that want to proof that Einstein was wrong!
• They that want to proof that Einstein was right!
But in every caricature or joke for that matter is a kernel of truth about the author. Moreover it takes one to recognize one. Or you best catch a thief with a thief, and so one. But seriously most authors are non-professionals, nontheless highly intelligent and creative people with a passion for science and mathematics. Although most of the time they are neglected by the scientific establishment. The Journal of Randomics is their loophole. However sometimes there is peer review collaboration with universities and scientific institutes. Moreover valuable SATOCONOR Journals articles are not neglected by Wikipedia page makers, passed the sci.math.research moderator and Sloane's Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences peer review.
Johan G. van der Galiën (Chief Editor)
July 16, 2011